Fotografer
27th November 2010, 10:19 AM
I'm photographing for our HS choir royalty, and it's not a payed gig or anything but I'd like the pics to turn out good. My question is would a Canon 300d with a 50mm $99 prime lens work better than a Canon PS 120 IS? </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I can cram to try and buy the 50mm prime, but I'd rather not have to suffer to buy it. The venue will be a dimly lit PAC with a spotlight focusing on the royalty as they make their way to the stage. Would a PS cover this well enough?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>My current lens for my 300D is a Sigma 17-50 mm 1:3.5-5.6 DC and it is horrible in low light.</p>
<p>&n
<p> </p>
<p>I can cram to try and buy the 50mm prime, but I'd rather not have to suffer to buy it. The venue will be a dimly lit PAC with a spotlight focusing on the royalty as they make their way to the stage. Would a PS cover this well enough?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>My current lens for my 300D is a Sigma 17-50 mm 1:3.5-5.6 DC and it is horrible in low light.</p>
<p>&n